The Integrity of Science
Last year, a paper authored by Woo Suk Hwang and published in the prestigious scientific journal,
Science, turned out to contain fraudulent data. A similar incident
occurred a few years ago when a Hendrik Schon published papers in both
Science and Nature containing fabricated data. Many feel
these
incidents have given the scientific community a black eye and pointed out
major flaws in how research is reported. However, I think it
actually reinforced the integrity of science.
Although one may get away
with falsifying data and results for a short time, eventually their fraud
will be discovered. During the peer review process, reviewers are
interested in assessing whether the data and results support the
conclusions made in the paper, and whether such results are worthy of
publication. They do this under the assumption that the data presented is
honest and veracious. If the burden of investigating the honesty of the
data were placed on the reviewers, the advance of science would slow
significantly as reviewers are also active in conducting their own
scientific research.
The prevalence of scientific fraud is too low to
warrant such a burden on the reviewers. Thus, although a fraudulent paper
may be published, when other scientists begin attempts to replicate the
results or to build upon them, the fraud will be discovered. It does mean
that resources of the later scientists have been squandered in the
discovery of the fraud, but imagine the amount of time and money that would be
required to verify data prior to publication of every paper. Thousands of
papers are published every year in hundreds of journals, virtually all of
them by honest scientists. The weak link in the current system seems to be
that of the role of co-authors. It is the co-authors that need to take on a
greater role in the verification of data, and thus holding them responsible
for falsification of data is perhaps the solution to the problems in the
current system.

